Neil Gorsuch, President Donald Trump's pick for the US Supreme Court, has been accused of including language from other authors in his own writing without proper attribution.Multiple news outlets reported Tuesday night that portions of one chapter in Gorsuch's 2006 book, "The Future of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia" and an academic article from 2000 contain text borrowed from other works without credit to the original authors.In some instances, Gorsuch allegedly "borrowed from the ideas, quotes and structures of scholarly and legal works," Politico reported, citing documents related to the matter.One example cited by Politico notes that, in Gorsuch's book ' which was adapted from his Oxford University dissertation ' some passages were lifted from an article originally published in the Indiana Law Journal. Text was copied without attributing the article's original author, Abigail Lawlis Kuzma. Gorsuch apparently cited Kuzma's sources instead, while copying her verbiage nearly word-for-word without crediting her, Politico's John Bresnahan and Burgess Everett wrote.Critics have suggested the incidences call into question Gorsuch's qualifications for a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court, which itself has been a long-playing battle in Congress since Justice Antonin Scalia died last year.Kuzma and the White House have both come to Gorsuch's defense. Kuzma, who is now Indiana's deputy attorney general, said 'These passages are factual, not analytical in nature. It would have been awkward and difficult for Judge Gorsuch to have used different language,' Politico reported.White House spokesman Steven Cheung waved off any suggestions that Gorsuch acted improperly, calling it a "false attack" by critics "desperate to justify the unprecedented filibuster of a well-qualified and mainstream nominee to the Supreme Court."But Syracuse University professor Rebecca Moore refuted those defenses in an interview with Politico, saying "Each of the individual incidents constitutes a violation of academic ethics. I've never seen a college plagiarism code that this would not be in violation of."The plagiarism accusations surfaced on the same night that Democrats dug in their heels on the Senate floor to stall a vote on Gorsuch's Supreme Court confirmation. Sen. Jeff Merkley of Oregon held the floor for hours Tuesday night while a threat from Majority Leader Mitch McConnell loomed, opening up the possibility of a rules change that would eliminate the filibuster and hasten Gorsuch's confirmation.At least two other people in Trump's orbit have been accused of plagiarism. Monica Crowley, an early pick for Trump's National Security Council was forced to withdraw her name from consideration in January. And First Lady Melania Trump garnered national criticism for copying, nearly verbatim, excerpts of a speech from former First Lady Michelle Obama for her own speech at the Republican National Convention in July.SEE ALSO:What is the nuclear option' How the Gorsuch vote might change Senate precedentDON'T MISS:Top Democrat: Republicans invoked the 'nuclear' option with Obama's Supreme Court nominee ' 'the rest is fallout'Join the conversation about this storyNOW WATCH: Watch Trump's budget director explain proposed cuts for after-school programs that feed children
Click here to read full news..
