function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){'undefined'!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if('object'==typeof commercial_video){var a='',o='m.fwsitesection='+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video['package']){var c='&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D'+commercial_video['package'];a+=c}e.setAttribute('vdb_params',a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById('vidible_1'),onPlayerReadyVidible); This month marks a full decade since Vivid Entertainment released Kim Kardashians sex tape with her one-time boyfriend Ray J.Kim Kardashian, Superstar is the most-watched X-rated video of all time, and its that kind of success that makes it difficult for people to believe that Kardashian or her mother, Kris Jenner, had no role in leaking it.Kardashian has always maintained that no one in her family was involved in the leak, herself included. In fact, she initially sued to prevent Vivid from releasing the tape.But there have always been naysayers. A biography about the family released last year,Kardashian Dynasty,goes so far as to claim that Vivid never wouldve announced its plans to release the tape unless they knew Kardashian would give her consent once they came to terms on a price. Author Ian Halperin further claims that Kardashians lawsuit was nothing more than an attempt to portray herself as a victim of an unscrupulous thief or Ray J himself.Now, thanks to Page Sixwho spoke to major players of the era, we have a much clearer idea of what exactly went on.Steve Hirsch, Vivid Entertainment CEO, maintains that a third party brought the sex tape to Vivid.Hirsch explained to Page Six that he decided to pursue the tape not because Kardashian was a celebrity, but because of all the people she was connected to. His statements directly oppose Halperins accusations that Kardashian was in on it from the beginning.The next step was trying to get a deal done. She wasnt involved in that. It was trying to get a deal done with the people who had the footage. They had guaranteed that we would be able to distribute it. I questioned that as time went onI think we announced we had the footage, and thats when we started getting legal letters from Kims attorney.Hirsch also maintains that neither Kardashian nor her mother were involved in the early stages of selling the tape.In order for Vivid to legally release the tape, both Kardashian and Ray J had to sign their rights away to the company. There is no disputing that. There is some confusion, however, over the idea that the company would never have attempted to even pursue the rights to the video if one of the participants wasnt interested. According to Hirsch, thats not the case.It was a very difficult time, and ultimately we were able to come to an agreement. It was a very difficult deal to get done. Probably [the hardest deal weve done]. [Kim] did not want it to happen, he told Page Six. I know people have speculated on [whether she planned the release of the tape from the beginning], but the facts are the facts. A lot of nonsense has been reported over the years[The persistent rumors about Kris Jenner, Kardashians mother, being involved in selling the tape are] such nonsense. I dont know who started that. [People dont want] the truth to get in the way of a good storyI had no contact with [Kris].Karrine Steffans, a former Video Vixenwho previously dated Ray J, told Page Six that the singer believed the sex tape would bring him wealth and more fame.Multiple sources report that Kardashian did not want the tape to go public before she ultimately gave in and settled with Vivid to release the video. On the other hand, Steffans claims Ray J was convinced this would help him break free from his older sister Brandys shadow.And he really, really, really, really believedreally in his heart of hearts believedthat this sex tape was going to finally make him white-girl famous, she told Page Six. Its a different kind of famous. White girls can do anything and be famous; a white girl could slip and fall in the middle of Rodeo Drive and all of a sudden shes a star. Black women cant do that, and certainly black men cant do that, and white men cant do that.In the end, Kardashian sold Vivid the footage so they were legally able to distribute it. Its been reported that she was paid $5 million, a figure that Kardashians lawyer, Marty Singer, told Page Six is greatly inflated. Hirsch declined to comment other than to say the company hasnt disputed it.Kardashians tape was likely the last successful celebrity sex tape, according to Jim McBride, who runs the celebrity nudity website Mr. Skin.2007 was a far different time in celebrity culture, where the media treated invasions of privacy with gleeful abandon. McBride points out that today, after events like The Fappening' where dozens of female celebrities had nude photos hacked and posted online ' its doubtful a company such as Vivid could ever market a sex tape in the same manner as Kardashians.Look at the Fappening and even the thing that happened to Erin Andrews [the ESPN reporter who was secretly filmed undressing in a hotel room, the video of which went viral in 2009]. Every person today on their private phone has something they probably dont want people to see, whether it be nude pics, sex pics, or something they dont want out there. I think when the Fappening happened, it made everyone feel vulnerable.For more of the oral history of Kim Kardashians sex tape, head over to Page Six.Tina Fey, Alec Baldwin, Tom Hanks, Tracy Morgan, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Michael Moore, Padma Lakshmi and a whole host of other stars are teaming up for Stand for Rights: A Benefit for the ACLU. Donate now and join us at 7 p.m. Eastern on Friday, March 31 on Facebook Live. #standforrights2017 -- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
Click here to read full news..
